New Service — Now Available
A deeper, more compassionate lens on the patterns that shape how we think, feel and behave. Now offered alongside CBT at Sinodun Hill Therapy Centre.
A note on training: I have recently completed IFS Institute Level 1 training - the foundational programme of the IFS Institute, the body established by Dr Richard Schwartz, the originator of the IFS model. I now offer IFS therapy, IFS-informed CBT, and standard CBT, and will work with you carefully to determine the approach best suited to your needs.
For many clients, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy provides a clear, practical and highly effective path through anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. For others - particularly those with complex histories, persistent self-critical patterns, or difficulties that have not fully resolved through cognitive approaches alone - something more may be needed.
Internal Family Systems offers that additional dimension. It does not replace the rigour and structure of CBT; it deepens it, providing a framework for understanding not just what we think, but why certain parts of us hold so firmly to the thoughts and beliefs they do.
Internal Family Systems was developed by Dr Richard Schwartz in the 1980s and has established a growing evidence base across a range of presentations, including trauma, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. It is recognised by in the United States as an evidence-based practice (see SAMHSA), and its integration with cognitive approaches is increasingly supported in clinical literature.
The central premise is straightforward: we do not have a single, unified mind. We each contain multiple inner voices, emotional states and habitual patterns of responding. IFS calls these parts. This may sound abstract at first, but it is something most people recognise quickly once they begin to pay attention.
IFS is a non-pathologising model. It holds that every part, however disruptive its behaviour may seem, developed its role in response to experience and is, in its way, trying to protect you. Therapy involves helping parts to understand that circumstances have changed, to carry less of the burden they have been holding, and to operate in ways that serve you better.
Protective parts are those that work to keep you safe from pain or threat. Some do so proactively - the relentless inner critic that drives you towards high standards so that you cannot be found wanting; the perfectionist that keeps working long past exhaustion; the vigilant worrier that rehearses every possible difficulty in advance. Others respond reactively, moving swiftly to numb, distract or withdraw when distress becomes too great. Both types of protector are, in their way, trying to help.
Exiled parts are typically younger, more vulnerable aspects of the self that carry the weight of difficult or painful experiences - feelings of shame, worthlessness, loneliness or fear. Protective parts often work hard to keep these exiles hidden, because the feelings they carry can seem overwhelming or dangerous. IFS therapy involves carefully and gradually making contact with exiled parts, helping them to feel genuinely understood, and supporting them to release the burdens they have been holding.
CBT is a structured, evidence-based therapy that helps you to identify and change unhelpful patterns of thinking and behaviour. If you have worked with me in CBT, you will be familiar with the concepts of negative automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, core beliefs, and the connections between thoughts, feelings and actions. This framework remains central to my work.
IFS adds a further dimension of understanding.
In standard CBT, the inner critic is a target for cognitive restructuring: we examine the evidence, challenge the distortion and build a more balanced perspective. This is valuable work. IFS offers a complementary approach. Rather than treating the critical voice as an adversary, we become curious about it. What is it trying to prevent? What would it need so that it didn't have to work so hard.? This shift - from challenging the critic to understanding it as a protector with a history - can make the work feel more sustainable, and less like an ongoing argument with oneself.
A common pattern in CBT: a client identifies a core belief such as "I am fundamentally inadequate." Careful cognitive work helps to challenge the evidence and construct a more balanced view. Yet sometimes, even after thorough and thoughtful cognitive work, the belief returns. IFS helps to explain why. There is often a part - typically a younger, exiled part, until that part is genuinely understood and helped to update, the belief may remain stubbornly tenacious. IFS provides the means to reach it.
CBT's evidence-based approach to anxiety typically involves gradual engagement with feared situations, building tolerance and disconfirming unhelpful predictions. When a protector part is genuinely frightened, however, asking it simply to face the fear can feel incomplete, or too much. An IFS-informed approach first acknowledges the protective intention of the part, understands the fear it carries, and gains permission to proceed. Behavioural change then tends to feel less like an act of willpower and more like a natural development from within.
For those presenting with trauma or PTSD, the IFS model provides a particularly coherent and compassionate framework. The distinction between protective parts and exiled parts maps closely onto our understanding of trauma responses - why certain memories and feelings remain cut off, and why the system works so hard to keep them at a distance. This supports a paced, carefully sequenced approach to trauma processing that respects the functions those protective strategies have been serving.
If you are new to therapy, I will discuss with you carefully at the outset which approach, or combination of approaches, you might like to try or which is likely to serve you best. Many clients benefit from a blended model — drawing on the structured skills of CBT alongside the relational depth of IFS, and moving between the two as the work requires.
If you are an existing client and are curious about how IFS might inform our work together, please do raise this in session. There is no obligation to change direction. Sometimes introducing one or two IFS-informed questions into an otherwise CBT framework is enough to shift something that has felt stuck.
Whichever path we take, my commitment remains the same: to offer thoughtful, evidence-informed care in a space that is genuinely safe, non-judgmental, and collaborative.
If you would like to find out more about IFS, IFS-informed CBT, or any of the services I offer, I would be glad to hear from you.